Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 6:08:09 GMT
Do like him. Don't waste your money buying books written by some guy . Live. And you will finally be able to write ungrammatically like him. But you will have lived, you will have travelled, you will have increased the possibility of socialising. Let yourself be fascinated by music and cinema and forget the habits of previous centuries . The one quoted is a comment - not approved, obviously - that arrived in March on the article in which I spoke which is rarely read in Italy . We certainly don't need proof that Mr. EG reads little, or rather reads nothing: he hasn't even read - or perhaps not even understood (see functional illiteracy ) - that he doesn't have to write the comment in all capital letters, as reported in the comments field itself. I was also kind enough to email him that the comment wasn't approved for that reason, but that he could rewrite it.
He didn't do it and I'm not surprised: Mr. EG doesn't read, not even emails. Strange that he read the article though – or maybe he stopped at the title? Does culture take on other habits? That is, which ones? The gym is mentioned: the gym is not culture – or maybe Mr. Does EG misunderstand the meaning of bodybuilding ? – but it is a Special Data sporting activity. Going out is mentioned: going out to dinner, to the pub, to the disco is not culture, but entertainment. Is reading an antisocial activity? I read somewhere that human beings need to relate to their peers, to socialize - perhaps at this point I'm not so human , but I take note of it. Jokes aside, many activities are done alone: for example playing a musical instrument (if you don't do concerts, etc.), drawing, walking, cycling, sculpting, etc. Not all strong readers are antisocial people.
Does reading prevent other passions? I've never been passionate about music – although I occasionally buy a few CDs – but I like cinema. But I also have other passions besides reading, such as writing, drawing, the mountains. Reading certainly doesn't stop us from following our other passions. But even if it were, it would be our choice: it would mean that we are only passionate about reading. Is reading an obsolete habit? We can certainly agree on the fact that in the previous 2 centuries life habits were very different from those of today: the advent of radio and television first and of the internet later created new habits and new entertainment. But the gentleman, who has traveled more than us , speaks of 2 previous centuries. We are today in the 21st century: 2 centuries ago it was the 19th century, therefore in the middle of the 1800s. How many could read at the time and what could the common people read? Illiteracy was still high after the unification of Italy, in fact it stood at 78%: that is, 8 out of 10 people were illiterate.
He didn't do it and I'm not surprised: Mr. EG doesn't read, not even emails. Strange that he read the article though – or maybe he stopped at the title? Does culture take on other habits? That is, which ones? The gym is mentioned: the gym is not culture – or maybe Mr. Does EG misunderstand the meaning of bodybuilding ? – but it is a Special Data sporting activity. Going out is mentioned: going out to dinner, to the pub, to the disco is not culture, but entertainment. Is reading an antisocial activity? I read somewhere that human beings need to relate to their peers, to socialize - perhaps at this point I'm not so human , but I take note of it. Jokes aside, many activities are done alone: for example playing a musical instrument (if you don't do concerts, etc.), drawing, walking, cycling, sculpting, etc. Not all strong readers are antisocial people.
Does reading prevent other passions? I've never been passionate about music – although I occasionally buy a few CDs – but I like cinema. But I also have other passions besides reading, such as writing, drawing, the mountains. Reading certainly doesn't stop us from following our other passions. But even if it were, it would be our choice: it would mean that we are only passionate about reading. Is reading an obsolete habit? We can certainly agree on the fact that in the previous 2 centuries life habits were very different from those of today: the advent of radio and television first and of the internet later created new habits and new entertainment. But the gentleman, who has traveled more than us , speaks of 2 previous centuries. We are today in the 21st century: 2 centuries ago it was the 19th century, therefore in the middle of the 1800s. How many could read at the time and what could the common people read? Illiteracy was still high after the unification of Italy, in fact it stood at 78%: that is, 8 out of 10 people were illiterate.